coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre-Marie Pédrot <pierre-marie.pedrot AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:11:49 +0100
On 10/03/2016 18:09, Jacques-Henri Jourdan wrote:
> If I remember correctly, this restriction is important to soundness :
> because Prop is impredicative, we can build a proof of false from
> inhabited T -> T.
I'm not sure this is sufficient. IIRC, you need to assume in addition
that this function is the inverse of the inhabits constructor, otherwise
you won't be able to do much with this function alone.
PMP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Roger Witte, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Roger Witte, 03/10/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.