coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Gaëtan Gilbert <gaetan.gilbert AT skyskimmer.net>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 11:41:35 +0200
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=gaetan.gilbert AT skyskimmer.net; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=gaetan.gilbert AT skyskimmer.net; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT relay2-d.mail.gandi.net
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:2PKhOhVNeXL4pz5P56H7FK1K53PV8LGtZVwlr6E/grcLSJyIuqrYZRKAt8tkgFKBZ4jH8fUM07OQ6P+wHzFYqb+681k8M7V0HycfjssXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aSV3DMl9+If2wEYrPhey20fqz8tvdeVZmnj24NJx7rwm/qzL+t80cjJF+YvI+wxbVq30OdOVSz25yOXqInAfn5ca1+ZN5tSJdp6RypIZ7TazmcvFgHvRjBzM8PjVt6Q==
For autodetection of opam executables you may need to restart emacs for it to get the right PATH.
You can also look at variables coq-dependency-analyzer and coq-compiler.
Gaëtan Gilbert
On 28/10/2017 08:07, Chris Brinkley wrote:
I tried adding (setq coq-prog-name "~/opam-coq.8.6/4.01.0/bin/coqtop") to
init.el.
Emacs seems to accept the initialization and I no longer get the error executing
interactively, but I still get an error compiling a file containing a "Set
Warnings" command , which makes me doubt if ProofGeneral is using coqc 8.6, even
though it now seems to be using coqtop 8.6.
Is there an analogous way to control the coqc version ProofGeneral will use?
Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
You can customize coq-prog-name; alternatively, make sure that running coqtop
in your shell runs the right version of Coq.
On 2017-10-27 23:28, Chris Brinkley wrote:________________________________
But now when I run the troublesome command from Software Foundations 5.3, I
still get the same error, which makes me think ProofGeneral is not seeing the
new Coq version.
This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
the intended recipient, you should delete this message and any attachments.
- [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Gaëtan Gilbert, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Théo Zimmermann, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Gaëtan Gilbert, 10/28/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 10/28/2017
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.