coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Théo Zimmermann <theo.zimmi AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 11:14:05 +0000
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=theo.zimmi AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=theo.zimmi AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-vk0-f47.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:H9mIrR3eLGV9uzlQsmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8ZsesTI/ad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG96Eu7QZ06L/iOPJZy8p2d65qncMcZhBBVcuqP49uEgeOvODElDxN/XwbiY3T4xoXV5h+GynYwAOQJ6tLw6annrn5jkLXx77KABdJ+LvG4eUgd7k+fq1/sjvY4RPswi8ZLZ/NhC/qwOZ4tUWjIwkOKc0zxrhrX5BeuAQzmRtcwHA1y3g79u9qcYwux9bvOgsopZN
You may need to run "opam update" to see the 8.7.0 package.
And you may need to run "eval `opam config env`" to get the right coqtop and coqc in your PATH. Just check that you are running the right version with "coqtop -v" and "coqc -v" before launching Proof-General (from the terminal).Le sam. 28 oct. 2017 à 11:42, Gaëtan Gilbert <gaetan.gilbert AT skyskimmer.net> a écrit :
For autodetection of opam executables you may need to restart emacs for
it to get the right PATH.
You can also look at variables coq-dependency-analyzer and coq-compiler.
Gaëtan Gilbert
On 28/10/2017 08:07, Chris Brinkley wrote:
> I tried adding (setq coq-prog-name "~/opam-coq.8.6/4.01.0/bin/coqtop") to init.el.
>
> Emacs seems to accept the initialization and I no longer get the error executing interactively, but I still get an error compiling a file containing a "Set Warnings" command , which makes me doubt if ProofGeneral is using coqc 8.6, even though it now seems to be using coqtop 8.6.
>
> Is there an analogous way to control the coqc version ProofGeneral will use?
>
> Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
>> You can customize coq-prog-name; alternatively, make sure that running coqtop in your shell runs the right version of Coq.
>
>> On 2017-10-27 23:28, Chris Brinkley wrote:
>>> But now when I run the troublesome command from Software Foundations 5.3, I still get the same error, which makes me think ProofGeneral is not seeing the new Coq version.
> ________________________________
> This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and any attachments.
>
- [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Gaëtan Gilbert, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Théo Zimmermann, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Gaëtan Gilbert, 10/28/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 10/28/2017
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.