coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Clément Pit-Claudel <cpitclaudel AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:40:39 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=cpitclaudel AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=cpitclaudel AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-qt0-f196.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hi Andrew,
On 2018-04-26 14:57, Andrew Appel wrote:
> Of course, the same proof script would take exactly twice as much memory in
> 64-bit mode, because every pointer is twice as big.
I'm not too familiar with OCaml's encoding of inductive types, but surely
it's not all pointers, right? How can teh proof script take "exactly twice as
much" memory in 64-bits mode?
Clément.
- [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Andrew Appel, 04/26/2018
- RE: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Soegtrop, Michael, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Xavier Leroy, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Ralf Jung, 04/27/2018
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Jim Fehrle, 04/27/2018
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Jim Fehrle, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Adam Chlipala, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/28/2018
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Soegtrop, Michael, 04/27/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.