coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 07:58:24 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=adamc AT csail.mit.edu; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=adamc AT csail.mit.edu; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT outgoing-stata.csail.mit.edu
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
I generally find that 32 GB is uncomfortably little RAM to have on hand for the sorts of Coq proofs that I tend to write, especially during a parallel build.
On 04/27/2018 11:31 PM, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
On 2018-04-27 19:59, Jim Fehrle wrote:
1GB actually sounds like a very typical memory footprint for a large Coqfortunately, my VST proof development is itself much more efficient, soSounds like a memory leak.
therefore I can do big things with a large collection of .v files that /each/
take no more than 1 gigabyte (and usually much less) to process with coqc.
proof, in my experience. It's not uncommon to grow to 10 or 15GB for larger
ones.
- [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Andrew Appel, 04/26/2018
- RE: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Soegtrop, Michael, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Xavier Leroy, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Ralf Jung, 04/27/2018
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Jim Fehrle, 04/27/2018
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/27/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Jim Fehrle, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Adam Chlipala, 04/28/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Clément Pit-Claudel, 04/28/2018
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [Coq-Club] speed of Coq 8.8 vs 8.7, 32-bit vs 64-bit, Soegtrop, Michael, 04/27/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.