Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] A criticism to CIC from the point of view of foundations of mathematics (Voevodsky's argument)

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] A criticism to CIC from the point of view of foundations of mathematics (Voevodsky's argument)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "R. Pollack" <rpollack0 AT gmail.com>
  • To: Coq-Club Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] A criticism to CIC from the point of view of foundations of mathematics (Voevodsky's argument)
  • Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 11:03:46 +0100
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=rpollack0 AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=rpollack0 AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-qk0-f180.google.com
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

Emilio says:

It is my understanding that his views were influenced by Edward Nelson
which were quite radical AFAICT. IIRC, at some point Nelson wrote a
"theorem prover" and claimed to have found a proof of "PA ⊢ ⊥", but it
seems it was not correct.

​Nelson was not as nutty as this might suggest.  He took the view that natural number induction is not predicative, because one quantifies over all natural numbers.  In his classic monograph "Predicative Arithmetic" he discusses formal systems​ that are predicative in his sense. IIRC such systems do not prove totality of exponentiation, so Godel's Theorem may be unprovable.

--Randy





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page