coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Evan Marzion <emarzion AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:09:50 -0500
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=emarzion AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=emarzion AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-il1-f174.google.com
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:oB7oXKPQECfynsBcTvijsMiBIKoaSvp037BL7TEJdfUxSKalfq+V7ZEmPHPP+VQssTQb6LO90cq7IE80l6QFhbX5VI3KNGLbUSmTTL2KhrGSpAEIdReOkNK1Fp0NT0G9MrDN5JRB4voSKTPXL+od
- Ironport-phdr: A9a23:jt/nbxEAibb1twHFOXi84J1GfxtMhN3EVzX9CrIZgr5DOp6u447ldBSGo6k03RmTDNqQtK8MotGVmpioYXYH75eFvSJKW713fDhBt/8rmRc9CtWOE0zxIa2iRSU7GMNfSA0tpCnjYgBaF8nkelLdvGC54yIMFRXjLwp1Ifn+FpLPg8it2O2+5pnebx9WiDe5Y75+Ixe7oAXMvcQKnIVuLbo8xAHUqXVSYeRWwm1oJVOXnxni48q74YBu/SdNtf8/7sBMSar1cbg2QrxeFzQmLns65Nb3uhnZTAuA/WUTX2MLmRdVGQfF7RX6XpDssivms+d2xSeXMdHqQb0yRD+v6bpgRh31hycdLzM2/2/Xhc5wgqxVoxyvugJxzJLPbY6PKPZzZLnQcc8GSWdDWMtaSixPApm7b4sKF+cPMvhYoJP7p1ATqhWxHxOsBeLuyj9PgH/9wKo33PokEQ7cxgwhHtMOsHPSrNjuO6cSVPq6zKjMzTnZc/xW3jL95ZHOfxs8rv6CQah+ftDNyUkzCQzFlFOQpJTlMj2VyukAvXaW4epuWO6xlmMqrwF/rzezy8oyiITEhZwZxk3K+yh23os4K961RVBlbdK6HpZdsyKXOotoT84hRWxjpSU0yqUetJKlYCQHzI4ryh3fZvCdboSF4xPuWPyMLTp6i39ofq+0iQyo/ki60OL8U9G50FZUoSpBldnBrnUN2AbS6siDU/d9/0Oh1SuW2wDd9+1JI085mbDUK54mxb4wmZ4TvlrZEiDqn0X2ibeadkQi+ue29+TqeqvqqoOYOoNuiQzzMr4iltG+DOk5KAQCQmqW9Ouk2L3m50L5QbFKjvMskqnetZDXPdoUpqujDA9P04cj6hG/DzG93dQXmHkINlNFeBadg4f1PFHOJej0De2jjFS0jDdr2/fGM6X9DZXKN3jPiavufbJg60FH0wcz1tBe55dMCr4bOv7zW0nxtMbZDhAjKQC0zfznW51B0dYVXnvKCauEOovTt0WJ76QhObqifogQ7RvjIv5twvf0n34+nxdJcKygx4kWb3aQEfFvIkHfan3p1IRSWVwWtxYzGbS5wGaJViReMi7at00U6TQyCYbgBoDGFNnFaF2p2S66GthXYjkDBAnTTTHncIKLX/pKYyWXcJcJetksWr2oSotn3har5leS9g==
By induction, c is greater than n for all n. Thus, c > c, a contradiction.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 2:53 PM Vincent Semeria <vincent.semeria AT gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Coq club,Is it possible to axiomatize a term c : nat, such as c is greater than all standard natural numbers ? The first 2 lines are easy,Axiom c : nat.
Axiom c_gt0 : 0 < c.But then, could we consistently add this axiom ?Axiom c_non_standard : forall n:nat, n < c -> S n < c.If the last axiom is not consistent, we could modify Coq's type checker to interpret all names of the form c_gtSSSS...S0 as closed terms of the corresponding types SSSS...S0 < c. I am pretty sure that these terms are consistent, because if they introduced a proof of False, that proof would be a finite lambda-term with only a finite number of these c_gt terms. Then c could be replaced by the greatest of these terms, and we would obtain a proof of False in basic Coq.
- [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Vincent Semeria, 06/02/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, roux cody, 06/02/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Evan Marzion, 06/02/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Vincent Semeria, 06/02/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, roux cody, 06/02/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Vincent Semeria, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Eddy Westbrook, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Vincent Semeria, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, roux cody, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Ralf Jung, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Eddy Westbrook, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, roux cody, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Thorsten Altenkirch, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, roux cody, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Vincent Semeria, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Eddy Westbrook, 06/03/2021
- Re: [Coq-Club] Non standard natural numbers, Vincent Semeria, 06/03/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.