Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ssreflect - Re: [ssreflect] Localization of a ring

Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List

List archive

Re: [ssreflect] Localization of a ring


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Cyril <>
  • To: Bas Spitters <>
  • Cc: Assia Mahboubi <>, Ssreflect-mailinglist <>
  • Subject: Re: [ssreflect] Localization of a ring
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:04:15 +0200

In your case you must decide whether there exists k
such that d^k * (d^m y - d^n x) = 0, is your ring so specific that you can ?
--
Cyril

On 09/06/2017 17:01, Bas Spitters wrote:
Yes, that was what I was thinking about.
In our case, we only need decidable quotients.

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Cyril
<>
wrote:
Dear Bas and Assia,
I did consider localization when I was building the field of fractions,
however, since S⁻¹R does not have decidable equality
(s⁻¹x = t⁻¹y iff ∃u∈S, u(sy-tx) = 0)
it does not fit the current algebraic hierarchy of math-comp.
Best,
--
Cyril


On 09/06/2017 16:39, Assia Mahboubi wrote:

Hi Bas,

Le 09/06/2017 à 16:31, Bas Spitters a écrit :

Hi Assia,

Consider a ring R and d: R.
We'd need the localization R[1/d] with respect to the multiplicative
set S={1, d, d^2, ...}, the ring of fractions.


This looks indeed like the definition of the localization, in this special
case.
But I was wondering (out of sheer curiosity) about the more general
context in
which you need this construction.

assia

If it is not there, we'll probably just adapt if from the field of
fractions.

Best,

Bas







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page