Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ssreflect - Re: [ssreflect] Localization of a ring

Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List

List archive

Re: [ssreflect] Localization of a ring


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Bas Spitters <>
  • To: Cyril <>
  • Cc: Assia Mahboubi <>, Ssreflect-mailinglist <>
  • Subject: Re: [ssreflect] Localization of a ring
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:11:26 +0200
  • Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Pass ; spf=None
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:HbGI8h1nKfnbJvvssmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8Zse0QLfad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG96KtLQc06L/iOPJYSQ4+5GPsXQPItRndiQuroEopTEmG9OPEkbhLfTnPGQQFcVGU0J5rTngaRAGUMnxaEfPrXKs8DUcBgvwNRZvJuTyB4Xek9m72/q89pDXYQhEniaxba9vJxiqsAvdsdUbj5F/Iagr0BvJpXVIe+VSxWx2IF+Yggjx6MSt8pN96ipco/0u+dJOXqX8ZKQ4UKdXDC86PGAv5c3krgfMQA2S7XYBSGoWkx5IAw/Y7BHmW5r6ryX3uvZh1CScIMb7Vq4/Vyi84Kh3SR/okCYHOCA/8GHLkcx7kaZXrAu8qxBj34LYZYeYP+d8cKzAZ9MXXWhOXshRWSJPAY2ycpUBAPYOM+tDs4n9vkEDoQeiCQWwBu7izCJDiH/s3a091uQsCRzL0xY7H9kTrXrUtNT1NLsOUe+r1qnI1ijIYvRN1jvn8ofEaB4greuXXbJocMrR1VUvGB3fjlWLsoHlMDaV2f4Ms2if9eZvSeWvi2s+pgx3vzOhxd8sh5HXio4Jzl3I7yZ0zYYvKdGmVUJ2b8SoHZtfuiycKoB4WNktQ3tytyY/0rAGuYC0fCwNyJk/wh7Qcf2Hc4yR7hL9V+adPS50hHxldb+wnRqy/k+gyurzVsmwzllGtDZKkt7JtnwV1hzT7NaISudl80u/xTqC0xrf5+JELEwui6bXNpAszqQwm5ccqUjDGzX5mETyjK+YbEUk/e2o5vz8bbn8vJCQLYF1hhvlMqQ2m8y/Hfg4PRYUX2iA4um827jj8lf4QLVOlPE5jq7ZsJXCKcQBuqG5GxNV0pok6xunFDemy84YkmcJLFJBZh2Ik5TpNkrVIPH4CPe/m06jnC1qx/DAJL3hA4/CImLNkLf7Lv5B7Bt32RAyyZgL7INOC7VHK/XzV0nZtdrCDxZ/PRbikMj9D9Ao/IoFEVmXA7OFPbnJ+QuCoOtpPK+XfI4JpDvnMNAq4vfviTkynlpLLvrh5ocedH3tRqcuGE6ee3e5x45ZSWo=

R is a domain with decidable equality, which should be enough.

Best,

Bas

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Cyril
<>
wrote:
> In your case you must decide whether there exists k
> such that d^k * (d^m y - d^n x) = 0, is your ring so specific that you can ?
> --
> Cyril
>
>
> On 09/06/2017 17:01, Bas Spitters wrote:
>>
>> Yes, that was what I was thinking about.
>> In our case, we only need decidable quotients.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Cyril
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Bas and Assia,
>>> I did consider localization when I was building the field of fractions,
>>> however, since S⁻¹R does not have decidable equality
>>> (s⁻¹x = t⁻¹y iff ∃u∈S, u(sy-tx) = 0)
>>> it does not fit the current algebraic hierarchy of math-comp.
>>> Best,
>>> --
>>> Cyril
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/06/2017 16:39, Assia Mahboubi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bas,
>>>>
>>>> Le 09/06/2017 à 16:31, Bas Spitters a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Assia,
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider a ring R and d: R.
>>>>> We'd need the localization R[1/d] with respect to the multiplicative
>>>>> set S={1, d, d^2, ...}, the ring of fractions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This looks indeed like the definition of the localization, in this
>>>> special
>>>> case.
>>>> But I was wondering (out of sheer curiosity) about the more general
>>>> context in
>>>> which you need this construction.
>>>>
>>>> assia
>>>>
>>>>> If it is not there, we'll probably just adapt if from the field of
>>>>> fractions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bas
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page