Objet : Developers list for StarPU
Archives de la liste
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
- To: Nathalie Furmento <nathalie.furmento@labri.fr>
- Cc: "starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr" <starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] Scheduler heft
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:44:58 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel>
- List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Nathalie Furmento, le Wed 21 Nov 2012 10:39:42 +0100, a écrit :
> On 20/11/2012 13:58, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Nathalie Furmento, le Tue 20 Nov 2012 09:26:04 +0100, a écrit :
> >>The internal function static int _heft_push_task(struct starpu_task *task,
> >>unsigned prio) does not use the parameter prio in its body. Is it an
> >>error?
> >It's now all done inside _starpu_fifo_push_task, so the parameter can be
> >got ridden away.
> >
> >>At some point, the task priority it set:
> >>
> >> task->priority = 0;
> >That's only for the multiformat conversion tasks. I'm however surprised
> >we reset the priority to zero, I'd rather see the conversion tasks get
> >the same priority.
>
> Meaning we do not change it? Or we set it to the parameter prio ?
Meaning we *BOTH* do not change it for the original task, and we set
the conversion task prio to the original task priority. Doing only the
former would break multiformat support.
Samuel
- [Starpu-devel] Scheduler heft, Nathalie Furmento, 20/11/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Scheduler heft, Samuel Thibault, 20/11/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Scheduler heft, Nathalie Furmento, 21/11/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Scheduler heft, Samuel Thibault, 21/11/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Scheduler heft, Nathalie Furmento, 21/11/2012
- Re: [Starpu-devel] Scheduler heft, Samuel Thibault, 20/11/2012
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.