Accéder au contenu.
Menu Sympa

starpu-devel - Re: [Starpu-devel] internal function _starpu_can_use_nth_implementation called with STARPU_ANY_WORKER

Objet : Developers list for StarPU

Archives de la liste

Re: [Starpu-devel] internal function _starpu_can_use_nth_implementation called with STARPU_ANY_WORKER


Chronologique Discussions 
  • From: Andra Hugo <andra.hugo@inria.fr>
  • To: starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] internal function _starpu_can_use_nth_implementation called with STARPU_ANY_WORKER
  • Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:04 +0100 (CET)
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel>
  • List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>

Hi,

I think it should return 1 if there's an implementation for all types of
workers and 0 if there is at least 1 type of worker that does not have an
avaialble implementation.

Andra

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Nathalie Furmento" <nathalie.furmento@labri.fr>
> À: starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Envoyé: Mercredi 12 Décembre 2012 10:15:01
> Objet: [Starpu-devel] internal function _starpu_can_use_nth_implementation
> called with STARPU_ANY_WORKER
>
> All,
>
> The parallel tests are currently failing when calling
>
> _starpu_can_use_nth_implementation (arch=STARPU_ANY_WORKER,
> cl=0x617840,
> nimpl=0)
>
> The function _starpu_can_use_nth_implementation() does not have a
> case
> for the value STARPU_ANY_WORKER and ends up with an assert.
>
> Should the function just return 0 when called with STARPU_ANY_WORKER
> ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nathalie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starpu-devel mailing list
> Starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starpu-devel
>





Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Haut de le page