Accéder au contenu.
Menu Sympa

starpu-devel - Re: [Starpu-devel] Performance profiling of tile low rank cholesky (HiCMA) with StarPU on distributed memory systems

Objet : Developers list for StarPU

Archives de la liste

Re: [Starpu-devel] Performance profiling of tile low rank cholesky (HiCMA) with StarPU on distributed memory systems


Chronologique Discussions 
  • From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@inria.fr>
  • To: Hatem Ltaief <hatem.ltaief@kaust.edu.sa>
  • Cc: Kadir Akbudak <kadir.akbudak@kaust.edu.sa>, Aniello Esposito <esposito@cray.com>, "starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr" <starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr>, Aleksandr Mikhalev <aleksandr.mikhalev@kaust.edu.sa>, "Sameh M. Abdulah" <sameh.abdulah@kaust.edu.sa>
  • Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] Performance profiling of tile low rank cholesky (HiCMA) with StarPU on distributed memory systems
  • Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:15:46 +0200
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=samuel.thibault@inria.fr; spf=Neutral smtp.mailfrom=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org; spf=Pass smtp.helo=postmaster@hera.aquilenet.fr
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel/>
  • List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
  • Organization: I am not organized

Hatem Ltaief, le jeu. 26 avril 2018 16:22:55 +0000, a ecrit:
> We could give it another try with other scheduler policies but it seemed
> that eager was giving the best performance.

eager would be very performant with few workers, yes. But with many
workers lws would probably work better.

Samuel




Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Haut de le page