Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@dal.ca>
- To: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Benchmarks incorrect?
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:53:09 -0400
Hello:
On the CADO-NFS website, I noticed a benchmark for CADO-NFS 2.1 factoring
RSA-120 as 43.9 hours on a dual 8-core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650. This
measurement is much slower than what I'm seeing on a less powerful system.
Using a 2x Xeon E5540 (2 sockets, 4 cores per socket, 2 threads per core)
running CentOS 6 with GCC 4.6.1 and GMP 5.1.0, it takes me about 6 hours to
factor RSA-120 with Cado 2.1.1. I am running a command of the form:
./factor.sh
227010481295437363334259960947493668895875336466084780038173258247009162675779735389791151574049166747880487470296548479
-t 2 -s 8
Is there a mistake on the CADO website, or is there something else strange
going on?
Best,
Doug Staple
----- End forwarded message -----
- Benchmarks incorrect?, Douglas B. Staple, 12/16/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.