Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: paul zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
- To: canny georgina <cannysiska@gmail.com>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: [error] Failed on the filtering step.
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:49:53 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
> if i import the relations, then that means the CPU time computed for lattice
> sieving (at the end of computation) will be counted only from the rest of
> the
> relations that hasn't been collected, right? I mean, the CPU time will not
> be
> calculated from the start again right?
when you import relations, the reported CPU time might be nonsense.
If you want an accurate CPU time, restart from scratch (without importing
relations), or check in the cado-nfs sources that the reported CPU time is
correct, and if not propose a patch.
Paul Zimmermann
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] Failed on the filtering step., canny georgina, 07/26/2018
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] Failed on the filtering step., paul zimmermann, 07/26/2018
- Message not available
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] Failed on the filtering step., canny georgina, 07/26/2018
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] Failed on the filtering step., paul zimmermann, 07/26/2018
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] Failed on the filtering step., canny georgina, 07/26/2018
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: [error] Failed on the filtering step., canny georgina, 07/26/2018
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: [error] Failed on the filtering step., paul zimmermann, 07/26/2018
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: [error] Failed on the filtering step., canny georgina, 07/26/2018
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] [error] Failed on the filtering step., paul zimmermann, 07/26/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.