Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Wesley Smith" <>
- To:
- Subject: 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal)
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:35:45 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qpYnFRwAeuoqQtP5hiiAMofsb9/5T3iRf9aHelK2H2AVElX+6Bj30F1eQQrRrIsj8rVjk6VBwV0XjK1FjEx+27ZMu0ZfNcqKHoE1njf/vZ85NHzp2V+dz6scYj5j01BjlSmwpSi3UCfPzSCV3TgwPNdltPwPWIbwFbGfG/xSqNo=
Given the kighly parametric design of CGAL, I was wondering how
trivial/nontrivial it would be to reparametrize the 2D cartesian
kernal as a toroidal space in both dimensions. The best possible
answer would be that I would only have to change the equality measure
of Point_2, but somehow I doubt it's that simple. My ultimate goal is
to implement 2D geometry constructions such as voronoi on the surface
of a sphere where the 2 axes are angles for lattitude and longitude.
Any thoughts from people who have worked in the various kernels as to
the difficulty and steps required?
thanks,
wes
- 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal), Wesley Smith, 10/15/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal), Monique . Teillaud, 10/15/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal), Wesley Smith, 10/15/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal), Monique . Teillaud, 10/15/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal), Efi Fogel, 10/16/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal), Wesley Smith, 10/15/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] 2D Cartesian Kernel (toroidal), Monique . Teillaud, 10/15/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.