Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:10:11 +0100
Hello,
Has anyone done any comparative study of CGAL Delaunay triangulation
performance and quality with other robust code such as Jonathan's "Triangle"
and "TetGen".
My initial performance results show that CGAL is extremely slow compared to
"Triangle" and "Tetgen". And so far I had experimented with only 2D
triangulation
with very small corner angles, and mesh generation with "Triangle" was far
superior.
Any good feedbak will be highly appreciated.
Chaman Singh Verma
- Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, csv610, 01/08/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/08/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Ashwin Nanjappa, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Ashwin Nanjappa, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Ashwin Nanjappa, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/09/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.