Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Ashwin Nanjappa <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:50:13 +0800
wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone done any comparative study of CGAL Delaunay triangulation
performance and quality with other robust code such as Jonathan's "Triangle"
and "TetGen".
A bit offtopic ... for a comparison of 3D Delaunay tessellations see the paper "A Comparison of Five Implementations of 3D Delaunay Tessellation". Some pages of that paper can be seen online here:
<http://tinyurl.com/37qlwa>
~ash
- Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, csv610, 01/08/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/08/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Ashwin Nanjappa, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Ashwin Nanjappa, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Ashwin Nanjappa, 01/09/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay Triangulations with CGAL, Andreas Fabri, 01/09/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.