Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.3.1 slow with VC++2008 ?

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.3.1 slow with VC++2008 ?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Ophir Setter" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL 3.3.1 slow with VC++2008 ?
  • Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:58:24 +0300
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=c5iGogIwzrYUz7rY4UI7NKtLQbgHYbAiclFi/mdK6Hj6A0Wabr4NIOoSjxDZ0xu6QrGg+JrYcR/Ya1wpzZwtJK6HQA6yyHhKHotGM12i9nMkQqcEauZVquVIT8HZVQkTNpy6/Hr1Jg51lbo0zdNkCvpdfH6NqSPIyZGp0ezUHDM=

So what is the best thing to do?
I understand that the default CGAL build is _SECURE_SCL=0.

How come my project (that didn't define these macros) worked?
What about boost, GMP and MPFR? I didn't relate to this issue when compiling them to vc 9.0.
As I understood the default is _SECURE_SCL=1 and _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=1. So how come my code works?

I guess that if it works - don't touch.

O


On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Fernando Cacciola <> wrote:
Hi Ophir,

Hi,

[snip]


What can I do? Do all the dependency libraries also have to have
_SECURE_SCL=0 defined?

Yes.

_SECURE_SCL and _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING affect the definition of data structures (to add checks), so it's all or nothing.

HTH

Fernando


--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page