Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Andreas Fabri <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:30:23 +0200
The infinite vertex is SYMBOLIC, that is you shouldn't take its point
and evaluate geometric predicates with it
andreas
panayiotis foteinos wrote:
Thank you.
There is something else I do not quite understand. Could you explain how I can orient an infinite triangle?
Why the predicate orientation(infinite_vertex()->point(), Point(0,0), Point(0,6)) gives -1 (CLOCKWISE), but the test orientation(infinite_vertex()->point(), Point(1,0), Point(0,6)) gives 1 (COUNTERCLOCKWISE) ?
Regards,
Panagiotis Foteinos
On Friday 03 April 2009 03:39:47 Olivier Devillers wrote:
panayiotis foteinos a écrit :
-----> is this because the resulting mesh does not triangulate the convexyes
hull
(see the source of is_valid in Triuangulation_2.h)
either you only use the is_valid of the tds (do not check orientation
of triangles)
either you rewrite your own is_valid keeping the geometric check only
fot finite triangles.
- [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, panayiotis foteinos, 04/02/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, Andreas Fabri, 04/02/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 04/03/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, panayiotis foteinos, 04/03/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, Andreas Fabri, 04/03/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, panayiotis foteinos, 04/03/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 04/05/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, Mariette Yvinec, 04/06/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, panayiotis foteinos, 04/03/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, Andreas Fabri, 04/03/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] PSLG 2D Delaunay Triangulation, panayiotis foteinos, 04/03/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.