Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef_3 Question

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef_3 Question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Bart Janssens <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef_3 Question
  • Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:27:38 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Qjrb011T18OpF3iUOWb6DA/x+bKYmSSNTh72L7yCOy0gyMBnrdFewGdZGbCAe7Y5tu GQCpog96tAOICfHGkFYS2QQ6gcdzVcuSKm9k81wgM9zCrJIfxTH1OpNMmYaWyg+yk/LI zE5bTge3D5t2SPhiypQ3jYoPNibysTPQwT2IQ=

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:20 PM, naresh
<>
wrote:
> I am trying to find two polyhydron intersection in nef_3 package. But i
> found process is very slow because of exact arithmatic calculations.
>
> So i have question can i use use inexact arithmatic that gives me speed ?

Hi Alex,

Unfortunately, the algorithms from the Nef package can not work with
inexact numbers. I think one would need to use a completely different
approach to make booleans work with inexact math, but that would
probably sacrifice correctness in certain cases.

Cheers,

--
Bart



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page