Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Simon Perkins <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:04:35 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=l3/QQmCgWbivrCHHryF2lrSaO3hfMgIItQ8UqXBEJm5ZvMTxgpZ5oYbzq0O0tI0Dj9 d3vutZEg8iMYh/AGQbqgNyPG2eXF5cSHjD4aI1Cq18A3PyeaYREZ6StZX8X8bc4enh3Z kYRkipb7oJWoDaJhGdUYyCZPyt8DZe6ViNgDk=
Hi Laurent
I've added the assertion but the problem still occurs. Here is the code. It produces the two different precondition errors on both CGAL 3.5.1 and 3.6. The call to refine_Delaunay_mesh_2 is on line 62 of trigen.cpp.
thanks!
Simon
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory) <> wrote:
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 09:33:40 Simon Perkins wrote:Strange. Can you call "assert(tr.is_valid());" before you call
> Hi
>
> I recompiled my code with CGAL-3.6 and obtained a different precondition
> error
>
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'CGAL::Assertion_exception'
> what(): CGAL ERROR: assertion violation!
> Expr: n == zone.fh
> File: /home/simon/compile/CGAL-3.6/include/CGAL/Mesh_2/Refine_edges.h
> Line: 431
> Aborted
>
> Any suggestions?
refine_Delaunay_mesh_2?
If that assertion is correct, I would appreciate that you post your code, so
that I can reproduce the error on my machine.
--
Laurent Rineau, PhD
R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory http://www.geometryfactory.com/
Release Manager of the CGAL Project http://www.cgal.org/
--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
Attachment:
trigen.zip
Description: Zip archive
- [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/09/2010
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/16/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 03/16/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/25/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 03/23/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Precondition Violation in Mesh Refinement 2 Package, Simon Perkins, 03/23/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.