cgal-discuss - [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

[cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size

From: Dominik Szczerba <>
To:
Subject: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:00:45 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=DKgTX2nxP2LtU5fh+/lEHvPuMw9LBXTvtdlOQ95tc13Fl8CBm3rmH9VNRCDSVcRpId 7DLqSKNYnlqNos9rbcNVpibo4+fmhox4VxlObe6EKC7q9y2MezNmztK6t/GpFRtZjBze j7bqqWKYPbeTnPfRFv8XWqc4n5v1xKlg+Chko=

Hi

I need to impose LOWER bound on element size. According to the latest
documentaiton:

the radius bound: This parameter controls the size (edge length) of
mesh cells. Actually, it is an upper bound on the circumradii of the
mesh tetrahedra.

I can only provide the UPPER bound. However, in my cases, the smallest
generated element is 10 orders of magnitude smaller than the biggest
one, resulting in numerical precision problems in subsequent
computations.

Is there a way to specify the SMALLEST allowed element size or
otherwise control its size?

Thanks,
Dominik

[cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Dominik Szczerba, 12/01/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 12/02/2010
  - Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Dominik Szczerba, 12/02/2010
  - Message not available
    - Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Mariette Yvinec, 12/05/2010

List archive

[cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size