Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory)" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 10:44:30 +0100
- Organization: GeometryFactory
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 22:00:45 Dominik Szczerba wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to impose LOWER bound on element size. According to the latest
> documentaiton:
>
> the radius bound: This parameter controls the size (edge length) of
> mesh cells. Actually, it is an upper bound on the circumradii of the
> mesh tetrahedra.
>
> I can only provide the UPPER bound. However, in my cases, the smallest
> generated element is 10 orders of magnitude smaller than the biggest
> one, resulting in numerical precision problems in subsequent
> computations.
>
> Is there a way to specify the SMALLEST allowed element size or
> otherwise control its size?
My guess is that you are talking about one of the mesh generators of CGAL.
Anyway, both the 2D-, surface-,or 3D- mesh generators of CGAL work the same
way: you cannot specify a lower bound on the elements sizes.
--
Laurent Rineau, PhD
R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory http://www.geometryfactory.com/
Release Manager of the CGAL Project http://www.cgal.org/
- [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Dominik Szczerba, 12/01/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 12/02/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Dominik Szczerba, 12/02/2010
- Message not available
- Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Mariette Yvinec, 12/05/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] lower bound on element size, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 12/02/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.