Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] ridges strength sharpness computation

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] ridges strength sharpness computation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Roberto Lam <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] ridges strength sharpness computation
  • Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:49:18 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KLGG8xH/TC5MVNXocBWtatGVShX9OQudTsfQNLqS/g196gk2KTfU9nrOhLlgFfyaJF FPW3cJ78dImBn9FXvjL6ZI3hHVQD5b8nbwQYY5kXr8c5nuSzqbrAmnChcXTUGQarJkhd VE8ai24QSyJTeBoHuf97K1h+yDjzoAk4IaQvo=

Yes, the information is there (I didn't saw).
I should read careful
Thank


2011/5/9 Marc Pouget
<>:
> Hi,
>
>
> On May 6, 2011, at 5:44 PM,
> <>
>
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody, does anybody  knows how the strength and sharpness of ridges
>> are
>> determinated?
>
> just search the ridge doc page for these words
>
>> The line types in the output files (*.verb.txt) seem defined in
>> MAX_ELLIPTIC_RIDGE (1),   MAX_HYPERBOLIC_RIDGE (2),.... MIN_CREST_RIDGE
>> (6) is
>> my assumption right?
>>
>
> it seems it's correct:
> http://www.cgal.org/Manual/latest/doc_html/cgal_manual/Ridges_3_ref/Enum_Ridge_type.html#Cross_link_anchor_1608
>
> best
> Marc
>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
>> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
>> https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
> https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page