Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Olivier Devillers <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:41:00 +0200
Le 5/27/11 5:35 PM, Yohann a écrit :
Olivier Devillers-2 wrote:yes
If you constrained only edges then you can triangulate [some paper ofDo you mean I understood the problem the wrong way ? ie. you can constrain
Shewchuk]
edges but not faces.
Assume that you can constrain a face then you necessarily constrain its edges.
Constraining faces is more powerful (difficult/ possible) than constraining edges.
- [cgal-discuss] Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/27/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 05/27/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/27/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 05/27/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/27/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 05/28/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/30/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 05/30/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/30/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/30/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 05/28/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/27/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 05/27/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Yohann, 05/27/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Contrain faces within a 3d triangulation, Olivier Devillers, 05/27/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.