Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with a 3D Triangulation

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with a 3D Triangulation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andreas Fabri <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with a 3D Triangulation
  • Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:23:35 +0200
  • Organization: GeometryFactory


If you want you can post your code,
and put the data on a server so that we can
download it and try to reproduce/fix the problem.

It might also be the data. We had a user where
all points where on a 3D grid, or all points
where organized in k groups with identical x,y
and only varying z coordinate, where CGAL was
rather slow. We have a not yet released solution
for that.

best regards,

andreas

On 25/10/2011 14:14, Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso wrote:
Hi:

Thank you again for your answer. Yes, you are right I am using
Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions_kernel. For example with 4618
points, when I use the Triangulation_3 the triangulation is computed
in 3 sec and with Delaunay_triangulation_3 in 20 sec.

But my real simulation is with more than 3500 000 of points and 3.5
hours is much time for my time real simulations only computing the
triangulation.

Any comment about how I can do to improve my simulation time?

Best regards agian, and sorry for your time
Juan Carlos

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Marc
Glisse<>
wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso wrote:

Thank you for your answer. About my second question about the
computing time, you say that the problem would be my memory, but could
you tell me any suggestion about how I can obtain better performance?
I am using CGAL 3.9 with visual studio 2010, in a Pentium(R) Dual-Core
CPU 2.10 GHz and 2GB RAM. On the other hand, I have the maximum value
(8190 MB) of virtual memory in my windows 7 option.

To check whether it is memory, you should try with fewer points and see how
the running time evolves.

But first:
* I assume you are using Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions_kernel,
right?
* Are you using Triangulation_3? Did you try Delaunay_triangulation_3?

--
Marc Glisse

--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss





--
Andreas Fabri, PhD
Chief Officer, GeometryFactory
Editor, The CGAL Project

phone: +33.492.954.912 skype: andreas.fabri



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page