Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Daniel Duque <>
- To:
- Cc: Olivier Devillers <>
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:35:59 +0100
- Organization: UPM
If I recall correctly, these are points from medical imaging. In this case my
guess is that adding small random perturbations to all points would remove
degeneracies with a negligible impact on results.
D
On Thursday 24 November 2011 09:59:14 Olivier Devillers wrote:
> Le 11/24/11 10:29 AM, Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso a écrit :
> > Hello Andreas,
> >
> > Thank you for your answers.
> > Andreas Fabri this is the link with my set of points:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2516160/ALLtreatmentPoints.txt
>
> could you compress it ?
>
>
> it seems that your points are non only in parallel planes but are
> actually taken
> from a grid.
>
> In such a case you will have many cospherical (and even cocircular) points
> which create a lot of calls to the exact arithmetic.
>
> Notice that computing the Delaunay triangulation of a (full) grid is
> quite easy
> and should not be done using a standard Delaunay algorithm.
> Thus if your data set contains pieces of grid, and you know it,
> you may triangulate these parts "by hand"
>
> Olivier
--
http://dcain.etsin.upm.es/~daniel
- [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Monique Teillaud, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Monique Teillaud, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Monique Teillaud, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Olivier Devillers, 11/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Daniel Duque, 11/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Louis Lavery, 11/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Daniel Duque, 11/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Andreas Fabri, 11/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Daniel Duque, 11/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Louis Lavery, 11/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Daniel Duque, 11/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Computing Time Triangulation_3 vs Delaunay_triangulation_3, Monique Teillaud, 11/24/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.