Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - [cgal-discuss] good or bad triangulations?

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

[cgal-discuss] good or bad triangulations?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Juan Carlos Lopez Alfonso <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [cgal-discuss] good or bad triangulations?
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:37:46 +0100

Hi There

Again I want to ask about the coplanar test in 3D Delaunay triangulation, because after read the documentation I have not solved my problem. I have tested different Delaunay tirangulations and in different cases (different distributions of points) the resultant triangulations have several almost coplanar tetrahedras (very very small volume) and these are no very good triangulations. Before attempting to use another library to triangulate, I have some questions:

- if Delaunay  triangulations are not uniques, Are there forms in Cgal to obtian different Delaunay triangulations for the same point distributions? in order to avoid this problem.

- Are there forms in CGAL to impose a minimum volume for tetrahedras? something like a epsilon?
 
On the other hand, I still do not understand how in cgal when the jacobian using double precision is equal to zero, the triangulation give us coplanar tetrahedras (where the jacobians are about 1.0e-18). I will use this triangulation to optimizing a variational problem, and when the algorithm detect this tetrahedras the results are unexpected and erroneous.

Could you give suggestions to obtain better triangulations?

Sorry for these successive questions, but I dont know what I need to do to solve this problem, which is the only thing I need to complete the practical part of my model.

Best Regards and thank you in advance
Juan Carlos



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page