Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] good or bad triangulations?

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] good or bad triangulations?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Daniel Duque <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] good or bad triangulations?
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:57:08 +0100
  • Organization: UPM

Hi,

> - if Delaunay triangulations are not uniques, Are there forms in Cgal to
> obtian different Delaunay triangulations for the same point distributions?
> in order to avoid this problem.

Actually, they are pretty much unique, but for degenerate cases, such as
having four points on a circle in 2D. These may be important, or not. More to
the point, the Delaunay triangulation is the one that produces the "best"
tetrahedra, so it is unlikely that some other triangulation will solve your
problem.

I think S Loriot is right in his email, if the points are perfectly coplanar
then these tetrahedra will disappear.

Best,

Daniel

PS: A good reference book is Atsuyuki Okabe, Barry Boots, Kokichi Sugihara,
and Sung Nok Chiu. Spatial tessellations: Concepts and applications of
Voronoi
diagrams. Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Nueva York, NY, EEUU, 2 edition,
2000.


--
http://dcain.etsin.upm.es/~daniel



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page