Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

[cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Zohar <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl
  • Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:50:29 -0800 (PST)

1. Why is the Simple_Cartesian better than the Cartesian?

I found in the doc of simple_cart:

"In contrast to Cartesian, no reference counting is used internally. This
eases debugging, but may slow down algorithms that copy objects
intensively."

2. That's a good idea to first test the intersection using a predicate, and
only then find the type of intersection using an exact intersection. I
didn't realize up until now the difference between predicate and
construction .




--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Intersecting-with-Cartesian-kerenl-tp4425392p4438680.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page