Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Zohar <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:50:29 -0800 (PST)
1. Why is the Simple_Cartesian better than the Cartesian?
I found in the doc of simple_cart:
"In contrast to Cartesian, no reference counting is used internally. This
eases debugging, but may slow down algorithms that copy objects
intensively."
2. That's a good idea to first test the intersection using a predicate, and
only then find the type of intersection using an exact intersection. I
didn't realize up until now the difference between predicate and
construction .
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Intersecting-with-Cartesian-kerenl-tp4425392p4438680.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl, Zohar, 03/02/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/02/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl, Marc Glisse, 03/02/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl, Stefan Schirra, 03/02/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl, Philipp Moeller, 03/02/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl, Marc Glisse, 03/02/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Intersecting with Cartesian kerenl, Stefan Schirra, 03/02/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.