CGAL users discussion list

["Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>]

On 03/06/2012 04:22 PM, petitmalin wrote:
> hi,
> thank you for your reply really rapid.
> In fact, my program uses Delaunay triangulation during the whole process
> except at the last step, I want to do some local modifications of the
> triangulation but without the Delaunay triangulation constraint. That's why
> I want to crate a simple triangulation which is copied from the Delaunay and
> the local modifications could be done with this new triangulation.
>
> I have tested the tds.swap() but it does not work. In fact, if we have
> simple Triangulatio1, Triangulation2, and Delaunay1,Delaunay2.  We can have
> Triangulation1.tds()=Triangulation2.tds() and
> Delaunay1.tds()=Delaunay2.tds(), but never
> Triangulation1.tds()=Delaunay1.tds() with CGAL. Note also that in the
> typedefs, we use exactly the same Triangulation_data_strcture_3 for both
> simple triangulation and Delaunay triangulation.
>
> Do you have any suggestion about my problem? best regards
Don't really get what you want to do but you might want to do the following:

Delaunay_triangulation_3 dt1;
Triangulation_3 t1(dt1);

Sebastien.


> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Copy-of-Delaunay-triangulation-to-a-simple-Triangulation-tp4450013p4450185.html
> Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.