Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Copy of Delaunay triangulation to a simple Triangulation

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Copy of Delaunay triangulation to a simple Triangulation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Copy of Delaunay triangulation to a simple Triangulation
  • Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:16:55 +0100

Delaunay_triangulation_3<Gt, Tds_> inherits from
Triangulation_3<Gt, Delaunay_triangulation_3<Gt, Tds_>::Triangulation_data_structure>

If you use Fast_location policy, you internally want to use
the triangulation hierarchy which has enriched TDS items
(which why you have errors when Fast_location is here).

Sebastien


On 03/07/2012 02:53 PM, petitmalin wrote:
Ok, thanks for all your helps, I really appreciate them. Now I come here to
close the discussion.

I have solved my problem in a strange way. In fact, I have tried all methods
of conversion from Delaunay_3 to Triangulation_3 that you and your
colleagues proposed (even tried to convert manually vertices() and cells()
of Delaunay_3.tds() to Triangulation_3.tds() ), I got always errors of
compilation. So i tried to modify everywhere of my programme and strangely,
i found that if I comment "CGAL::Fast_location" in
"typedef CGAL::Delaunay_triangulation_3<K, TDS,CGAL::Fast_location>
Delaunay;"
and the problem is solved, no more compilation error exists.

I do not know if this is a bug of CGAL but the solution is that. I wish this
can help other people who met this problem.

best regards

--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Copy-of-Delaunay-triangulation-to-a-simple-Triangulation-tp4450013p4453310.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page