CGAL users discussion list

["Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>]

On 01/23/2013 03:23 PM, thann wrote:
> Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory) wrote
> > I would like to see the full build log (with -v) of one example where the
> > exceptions are caught correctly, and using the same compiler and same
> > version
> > of the CGAL library. There must be a difference.
>
> I agree. I revoke my previous statement though that the examples work with
> the used build setup. It was merely never the case that the exception was
> actually thrown with the input to the triangulation. Forcing the same input
> also gives the phenomenon.
>
> However, I tried Sebastiens (sorry for writing your name wrong earlier)
> suggestion to compile the examples via CGALs CMake scripts and the above
> mentioned modified example with changed input actually *does* work that way.
> I used the arguments of the resulting gcc calls on my example program and
> it's working there, too. I think it's some difference in the invoking of the
> linker. I might report back if I find the critical difference to be a
> non-trivial issue.
when configured with CMake, you can try "make VERBOSE=1" to see the 
command lines used to compile your example.

Sebastien.

> Thanks for your help!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Uncaught-CGAL-Uncertain-conversion-exception-tp4656528p4656559.html
> Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.