CGAL users discussion list

[liudaisuda <>]

Linking the dual points of two neighbor incident cells of a vertex is pretty much the same as getting the dual of the corresponding incident edge of that vertex.  Do you have any idea why my approach didn't work ?

On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:36 PM, 杨成林 [via cgal-discuss] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Why not just link the dual points of the incident cells?

2013/5/5 liudaisuda <[hidden email]>

I test the code, and for each vertex, it only collected two segments of the
power cell. Therefore, it is clearly incorrect. Anyone has any suggestion
how to achieve my goal?

--
View this message in context: http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Dual-power-cell-of-a-vertex-in-Regular-Triangulation-tp4657357p4657358.html

Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/info/cgal-discuss

--
杨成林
Yang Chenglin

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Dual-power-cell-of-a-vertex-in-Regular-Triangulation-tp4657357p4657359.html

To unsubscribe from Dual power cell of a vertex in Regular Triangulation, click here.
NAML

---

View this message in context: Re: Dual power cell of a vertex in Regular Triangulation
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.