Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition
Chronological Thread
- From: brYang <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Hi TableYoung,
I use fci->vertex(i)->point() ,where i = 0,1,2,3 to access the four vertices
of cells.
And for the cells incident to a vertex, I use :
//suppose dt is the delaunay triangulation
std::list<Cell_handle> cell_vector;
dt.incident_cells(vh, std::back_inserter(cell_vector));
to access all the incidental cells of vh
Then I draw all the line segments of each cell by connecting any two of the
four vertices of it.
But it still shows as the image above.
Is there any other possibility for causing this situation?
Baorong Yang
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/CGAL-triangulation-precondition-vs-CGAL-triangulation-expensive-precondition-tp4660727p4660733.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, Adam Getchell, 04/25/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, brYang, 04/27/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, TableYoung, 04/27/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, brYang, 04/27/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, TableYoung, 04/28/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, brYang, 04/27/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, TableYoung, 04/28/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, brYang, 04/28/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, TableYoung, 04/28/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, brYang, 04/28/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, BRYang, 04/29/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, TableYoung, 04/28/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, brYang, 04/28/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, TableYoung, 04/27/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition, brYang, 04/27/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.