Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition


Chronological Thread 
  • From: brYang <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL_triangulation_precondition vs. CGAL_triangulation_expensive_precondition
  • Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT)

Hi TableYoung,
I use fci->vertex(i)->point() ,where i = 0,1,2,3 to access the four vertices
of cells.
And for the cells incident to a vertex, I use :

//suppose dt is the delaunay triangulation
std::list<Cell_handle> cell_vector;
dt.incident_cells(vh, std::back_inserter(cell_vector));

to access all the incidental cells of vh

Then I draw all the line segments of each cell by connecting any two of the
four vertices of it.

But it still shows as the image above.

Is there any other possibility for causing this situation?

Baorong Yang



--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/CGAL-triangulation-precondition-vs-CGAL-triangulation-expensive-precondition-tp4660727p4660733.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page