coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Freek Wiedijk <freek AT cs.kun.nl>
- To: coq AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Partial reflection?
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:38:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Hi,
I have a question. I'm contemplating doing "partial
reflection". By this I mean "reflexion" (the "two-level
approach") but with "undefined expressions" on the
syntactical level. My idea is to replace the "interpretation
function" by an inductively generated "interpretation
relation" to model a partial & multi-valued function.
In that way one can have expressions like "1/0" on the
syntactical level, without the need to be able to "evaluate"
it to some real number on the semantical level.
I want something like that, because I want to generalize the
"Ring" tactic of Coq to include division too (so to generalize
it to a "Field" tactic.)
I wonder: has anything like this be done already? If so:
can anyone give me pointers to something about it in the
literature or on the web?
Freek
- Partial reflection?, Freek Wiedijk
- Re: Partial reflection?, Benjamin Werner
- Re: Partial reflection?, Cuihtlauac ALVARADO - STAGIAIRE A FT.BD/CNET/DTL/MSV
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.