coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jean-Christophe Filliatre <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre AT lri.fr>
- To: Jean-Yves Vion-Dury <jean-yves.vion-dury AT inrialpes.fr>
- Cc: Coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:38:36 +0200
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
> what about offering "Conjecture":
>
> 1. Such propositions could not be used (of course) in other proofs,
> but...
> 2. The coq compiler would accept incomplete proofs and still check
> for the correctness of what is present
>
> Interest ?:
>
> 1. Offers handling of partial but correct proof developments
> (especially for long and difficult proofs)
> 2. Enables maintaining of incomplete work (it is usually done through
> comments, thus not sensitive to contextual changes)
> 3. helps collaborative work
>
> Feasibility ? Doesn't seems unrealistic, is it ?
It seems that replacing "Qed" with "Abort" in a proof script is
exactly achieving this goal: the partial proof script is checked until
the "Abort" but the lemma is not saved thus cannot be used.
Lemma my_conjecture : ...
Proof.
proof script tentative.
...
Abort.
--
Jean-Christophe
- [Coq-Club] suggestion, Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion, Jean-Christophe Filliatre
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion, Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion,
Claude Marche
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion,
Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion, Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion,
David Aspinall
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion, Claude Marche
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion,
Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
- Re: [Coq-Club] suggestion, Jean-Christophe Filliatre
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.