coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Wojciech Moczydlowski <wm174746 AT zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] nat : Type?
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:16:56 +0200 (CEST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hello,
I'm a Ph. D. student in computer science and a newbie to Coq. During my
sessions with it I encountered the following behavior:
If I declare
Variable x : Type -> Type
in Coq 8.0
then (x nat) typechecks, that is Check (x nat) says that (x nat) : Type.
This seems weird, for I do not see how to derive nat : Type from the
inference rules in the documentation on the webpage, which seem to be
necessary to derive (x nat) : Type. What am I missing?
Thanks.
Wojtek
- [Coq-Club] nat : Type?, Wojciech Moczydlowski
- Re: [Coq-Club] nat : Type?,
Pierre Casteran
- [Coq-Club] convertibility,
Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
- Re: [Coq-Club] convertibility, Houda Anoun
- [Coq-Club] Impredicativity in Coq, Wojciech Moczydlowski
- [Coq-Club] convertibility,
Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
- Re: [Coq-Club] nat : Type?,
Pierre Casteran
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.