coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "Zhaozhong Ni" <nzz AT acm.org>
- To: <shao-zhong AT cs.yale.edu>, <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Cc: <flint-core AT cs.yale.edu>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Re: [Flint-core] Dependent elimination question?
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:52:26 -0500
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
I think the following works:
Definition F (A B : Set) (x : A) (y : R(A->B)) : R(B) :=
match y with
Rep y0 => Rep B (y0 x)
end.
-Zhaozhong
----- Original Message ----- From: "Zhong Shao" <shao AT cs.yale.edu>
To:
<coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
Cc:
<flint-core AT cs.yale.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: [Flint-core] Dependent elimination question?
Hi, given the following induction definition:
Inductive R (A : Set) : Type := Rep : A -> R(A).
assume that Set is a predicative universe (as in Coq 8.0),
Can I write a function F with the following type:
(forall A B : Set) A -> R(A -> B) -> R(B)
The naive way is to write it as:
Definition F (A B : Set) (x : A) (y : R(A->B)) : R(B) := match y with Rep y0 => Rep (y0 x)
end.
which of course does not work since y0 does not has type A->B.
Thanks a lot,
-Zhong Shao
(shao-zhong AT cs.yale.edu)
_______________________________________________
Flint-core mailing list
Flint-core AT cs.yale.edu
http://netra.cs.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/flint-core
- [Coq-Club] Dependent elimination question?, Zhong Shao
- [Coq-Club] Re: [Flint-core] Dependent elimination question?, Zhaozhong Ni
- [Coq-Club] Re: [Flint-core] Dependent elimination question?,
Zhong Shao
- [Coq-Club] Re: [Flint-core] Dependent elimination question?, Zhaozhong Ni
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: [Flint-core] Dependent elimination question?, Pierre Casteran
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.