Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Dealing with equivalence classes

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Dealing with equivalence classes


chronological Thread 
  • From: Edsko de Vries <devriese AT cs.tcd.ie>
  • To: Adam Megacz <megacz AT cs.berkeley.edu>
  • Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Dealing with equivalence classes
  • Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:58:28 +0000
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

Hi,

Just to say: independently of whether using setoids helps me with the
problem I really need to solve, it has certainly made all my proofs in
BooleanAlgebraM much nicer :) Thanks! New formalization available at

http://www.cs.tcd.ie/~devriese/coq

(By the way, this does not yet include the proof that True is not
equivalent to False, because the proof as suggested on this list is a
semantic proof, and I had generalized the module so that I cannot write
the semantic interpretation function -- I might have to change that
again.)

Edsko





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page