coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: muad <muad.dib.space AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi emily,
forall x, P x^Q x |- (forall x Px) ^(forall x Qx) isn't valid, so what
exactly is it that you are trying to
prove? bear in mind that: forall x, P x^Q x -> ... is different to (forall
x, P x^Q x) -> ...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Proof-Help-tp23006221p23012529.html
Sent from the Coq mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [Coq-Club] Proof Help, emily_p
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help, Luke Palmer
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help, muad
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help,
fdabrows
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help, fdabrows
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help,
Roman Beslik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help,
Thomas Braibant
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help, Roman Beslik
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help,
Thomas Braibant
- Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.