The Coq mailing list

[fdabrows AT irisa.fr]

Yep, you're right, I should have mentioned that one as well.
Still, for learning purpose, one should first avoid
the use of automatizing tactics.

> fdabrows AT irisa.fr
>  wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am fairly new to Coq and I am not sure if this is the right place to
>>>
>> ask but I am hoping someone can help me. I am having trouble with what I
>> think should be a simple proof. I am trying to solve the following
>>
>>> forall x, P x^Q x |- (forall x Px) ^(forall x Qx)
>>>
>
> I feel like I should jump in and bring up that the built-in [firstorder]
> tactic solves this goal, so that's the right way to do it in real
> developments. ;-)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Bug reports: http://logical.saclay.inria.fr/coq-bugs
> Archives: http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club
>           http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/wilma/coq-club
> Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/coq-club
>