Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help


chronological Thread 
  • From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT hcoop.net>
  • To: Thomas Braibant <thomas.braibant AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Proof Help
  • Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:18:48 -0400
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

Thomas Braibant wrote:
I feel like I should jump in and bring up that the built-in [firstorder]
tactic solves this goal, so that's the right way to do it in real
developments. ;-)

At this point, I fell I should ask what are the relative
advantages/disadvantages of using intuition versus firstorder in a
real development ? The manual is not very clear about this.

[firstorder] may run into an infinite loop, even without an infinite loop in the tactic you pass to it to discharge remaining subgoals. Because of this, I only try [firstorder] when [intuition] fails (and it seems like something generic should do the job), and I give up if [firstorder] runs for more than a few seconds without finishing.





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page