coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: staecker<cstaecker AT fairfield.edu>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] well-ordering of natural numbers
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:45:25 +0200
I'm new to Coq- trying to learn some basics.
I need to use a theorem like this:
Lemma nat_well_ordered: forall (P:nat -> Prop),
(exists n:nat, P n) -> (exists m:nat, P m /\
forall k:nat, P k -> k >= m).
I tried to find something like this in the standard library, but the closest I
found was:
Lemma dec_inh_nat_subset_has_unique_least_element :
forall P:nat->Prop, (forall n, P n \/ ~ P n) ->
(exists n, P n) -> has_unique_least_element le P.
which requires an extra decidability condition as well. Is there a stronger
version somewhere which doesn't require decidability? Is my version of the
theorem even true?
Thanks- chris
- [Coq-Club] well-ordering of natural numbers, staecker
- Re: [Coq-Club] well-ordering of natural numbers, Stéphane Lescuyer
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.