coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:10:34 -0500
On 02/24/2012 05:07 AM, Pierre Courtieu wrote:
Hello, here is a script proving your goal in v8.3 and v8.4 (14975). It
makes use of JMeq but the statement of the lemma is the one you want.
But the original request asked for an axiom-free proof, right? Your proof uses axiom [JMeq_eq].
- [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2, Andrew Polonsky
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2, Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2, Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2,
Vincent Siles
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2, Andrew Polonsky
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent induction 2, Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.