coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 08:20:06 +0200
On 06/05/2015 08:00, Vadim Zaliva wrote:
It now asks me to prove an obligation:
S pad = S p
Which does not make sense!
This is an artificial example which shows simplified case of a problem I am
facing as a part of a more complex proof. I am looking for any explanations
on why this is happening and how this could be avoided. Thanks!
This seems to be a bug in Coq, and it seems to have been fixed in 8.5. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to work around it in 8.4.
Best regards,
Guillaume
- [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors, Vadim Zaliva, 05/06/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors, James Wilcox, 05/06/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors, Guillaume Melquiond, 05/06/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors, Lars Rasmusson, 05/06/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors, Lars Rasmusson, 05/06/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors, Lars Rasmusson, 05/06/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange obligations in Coq proof on vectors, Lars Rasmusson, 05/06/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.