Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] evar anomaly

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] evar anomaly


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
  • To: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] evar anomaly
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:35:16 +0000
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=jasongross9 AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=jasongross9 AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-qt0-f175.google.com
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

Yes, this is a bug (an "anomaly" is always a bug worth reporting, though occasionally the bug is just "there should be a real error message here"), but it doesn't seem to occur in Coq 8.6; your "unshelve refine" fails.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:05 AM Tom Hirschowitz <tom.hirschowitz AT univ-smb.fr> wrote:

Hi all,

The little proof below fails on exact (...) with

Anomaly: cannot define an evar twice. Please report.

But it does go through using apply instead of exact.

Is this a bug?

Thanks,
Tom

PS: the code grew out of an attempt at finding an efficient way to program the equivalent

Definition trivial' A (a : A) (F : el (Typ A) a) : El a = F :=
  match F with El _ => eq_refl end.

from the tactic language (in a more complex setting, of course).

I'd be grateful for any hints about this too :)

---------------------------------------------------


Set Implicit Arguments.
Unset Strict Implicit.
Unset Printing Implicit Defensive.

Inductive typ : Type -> Type := Typ : forall T, typ T.
Inductive el : forall A, typ A -> A -> Type :=
  El : forall A (a : A), el (Typ A) a.

Definition trivial A (a : A) (F : el (Typ A) a) : El a = F.
  unshelve refine (@el_rect _ _ A (Typ A) a F).
  clear A a F.
  intros A X a F.
  unshelve refine ((@typ_rect (fun A' X' => (forall a' : A', el X' a' -> Type)) _ A X) a F).
  clear A X a F.
  intros A a F.
  exact (El a = F).
  simpl.
  reflexivity.
Defined.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page