Objet : Developers list for StarPU
Archives de la liste
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@inria.fr>
- To: vedran.novakovic@stfc.ac.uk
- Cc: starpu-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU on IBM Power8 systems
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:02:00 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/starpu-devel/>
- List-id: "Developers list. For discussion of new features, code changes, etc." <starpu-devel.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
- Organization: I am not organized
vedran.novakovic@stfc.ac.uk, on mar. 20 juin 2017 15:10:32 +0000, wrote:
> Unless some debugging flags that XL compilers don't understand are removed,
> as with:
>
> find . -name 'Makefile' -exec sed -i -e 's/\-gdwarf\-2//g' -e 's/\-g3/-g/g'
> {} \;
>
> (i.e., -gdwarf-2 -g3 to -g)
Erf, yes, we blindly pass these debugging options to the compiler.
> FAIL: datawizard/variable_size
> FAIL: disk/mem_reclaim
> FAIL disk/mem_reclaim (exit status: 1)
> [starpu][starpu_unistd_o_direct_global_async_write][assert failure] The
> unistd_o_direct variant can only write a multiple of page size 65536 Bytes
> (Here 2183168). Use the non-o_direct unistd variant if your data is not a
> multiple of 65536
These are more or less expected: we only tested on systems with pagesize
= 4096. It's actually the test which needs to be fixed, starpu itself
works fine.
Samuel
- [Starpu-devel] StarPU on IBM Power8 systems, vedran.novakovic, 20/06/2017
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU on IBM Power8 systems, Samuel Thibault, 20/06/2017
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU on IBM Power8 systems, vedran.novakovic, 20/06/2017
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU on IBM Power8 systems, Samuel Thibault, 20/06/2017
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU on IBM Power8 systems, vedran.novakovic, 20/06/2017
- Re: [Starpu-devel] StarPU on IBM Power8 systems, Samuel Thibault, 20/06/2017
Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.