Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Paul Leyland <paul.leyland@gmail.com>
- To: Zimmermann Paul <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:34:27 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 12:10 +0200, Zimmermann Paul wrote:
> Paul,
>
> > Hmm, perhaps I see the problem. wdir in the param file is . and the
> > bwc.pl script should have wdir expanded to the absolute path before it
> > is called. Is this the problem? If so, do I set wdir to be the
> > complete path in the param file and then call cadofactor.pl again?
>
> yes wdir must be an absolute path, not a relative one.
>
> Paul Z.
Everything is now running again. For the record, the failing job and
the restarted job have these command lines:
[1]+ Exit 2 ../cadofactor.pl params=../params/params.c147
wdir=. name=c147 n=`cat num.n` machines=./mach_desc
pcl@maat ~/cado-nfs/test $ pwd
/home/pcl/cado-nfs/test
pcl@maat ~/cado-nfs/test $ ../cadofactor.pl
params=/home/pcl/cado-nfs/params/params.c147 wdir=/home/pcl/cado-nfs/test/
name=c147 n=`cat num.n` machines=/home/pcl/cado-nfs/test/mach_desc
Nonetheless, cadofactor.pl should convert relative to absolute paths
where required and, as Emmanual says, this is a bug in the current
implementation.
Paul L.
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, (continued)
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/04/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/05/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/05/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/06/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/08/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/10/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Emmanuel Thomé, 04/10/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/10/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/10/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/13/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/13/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/07/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Zimmermann Paul, 04/06/2013
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Possible problem with "purge!'s ARGV?, Paul Leyland, 04/05/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.