Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Deepak Bandyopadhyay <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:52:54 -0400
Hi Amir,
The three plane intersection is an issue that I ran into also, as you will see in the following journal paper where I suggest a workaround if you need to use cartesian doubles for some reason (such as for speed).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2006.11.003
I can send you the paper or the code fragment off the list, if you are interested. Essentially it is solving for the intersection point of all three planes directly (using Cramer's rule) rather than doing intersections two planes at a time.
Regards,
Deepak.
wrote:
This is not a robustness problem, there is no comparison involved. I just get
point (it being a point is certain) which is wrong.
Amir.
Monique Teillaud wrote:
Dear Amir,
You may want to have a look at
- the FAQ (see Kernels and Number Types)
- the CGAL philosophy
available on the CGAL web site.
Best regards,
Moniqque Teillaud
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, avaxman, 09/10/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, Bernd Gaertner, 09/10/2007
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, Christophe Delage, 09/10/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, Deepak Bandyopadhyay, 09/13/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, avaxman, 09/10/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, Bernd Gaertner, 09/10/2007
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, avaxman, 09/10/2007
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, Christophe Delage, 09/10/2007
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, Fernando Cacciola, 09/10/2007
- AW: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Bug in 3 Planes intersection?, Gärtner Bernd, 09/10/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.